• Instgram
  • LinkeIn
  • Lexologoy

JAPANESE ENGLISH

Bases in Japan

Tokyo

Tokyo

Japanese businesses looking to expand into ASEAN countries require both an understanding of local laws and how they are practically applied. Ultimately, they must consider whether their investment and development
decisions are in line with Japanese legal requirements. As the relationship between the ASEAN region and
Japan deepens, there is also increased investment from ASEAN into Japan.

Our member firm in Japan is One Asia Lawyers (One Asia法律事務所). Under the direction of our head partners with their
international legal experience, we provide our clients standard legal services in the areas of M&A,
company law, labor law, venture regulation, real estate law, debt financing law, IP, litigation, alternative dispute resolution and international trade regulation. We have the resources and the expertise across all areas
necessary for business operation in Japan.

Contact (English and Japanese)

Tel:
+81-3-6550-9000
Fax:
+81-3-6550-9905
Email:
info@oneasia.legal
address:
One Asia Lawyers : 31F Kasumigaseki-Building, 3-2-5, Kasumigaseki, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo  100-6031  Japan
→Directions to the office

Osaka

Osaka

Contact (English and Japanese)

Tel:
+81-6-6311-1010
Fax:
+81-6-6311-1017
Email:
info@oneasia.legal
address:
One Asia Lawyers Osaka Office : #403 Umegae-Chuo-Bldg. 4-4-18, Nishitenma, Kita-ku, Osaka-shi, Osaka-fu  530-0047  Japan

Fukuoka

FUKUOKA

Contact (English and Japanese)

Tel:
+81-92-731-7074
Fax:
+81-92-731-7085
Email:
tomonari.koshiji@oneasia.legal
address:
One Asia Lawyers Fukuoka Office : 3rd Floor, TERASU ROPPONMATSU, 1-2-5, Baikoen, Chuo-ku, Fukuoka  810-0035  Japan

Newsletter

2025/12/03
Japan: Case Law Introduction ~A Case Where a Mid-Career Job Offer Was Revoked Due to False Educational and Career Background~
2025/11/12
Japan: Digitalization of Procedures Related to Notarial Deeds
2025/09/19
Japan: Amendments to the Subcontract Acts
2025/08/20
Japan: Regulatory Sandbox
2025/07/14
Japan: Introduction of Case Law ~A case where Article 19, item (ii) of the Labor Contract Act was applied by analogy to a worker employed on a daily basis~